Journal cover Journal topic
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.329 IF 1.329
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 1.394 IF 5-year
    1.394
  • CiteScore<br/> value: 1.27 CiteScore
    1.27
  • SNIP value: 0.903 SNIP 0.903
  • SJR value: 0.709 SJR 0.709
  • IPP value: 1.455 IPP 1.455
  • h5-index value: 20 h5-index 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-2018-15
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Review article
05 Mar 2018
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics (NPG).
Review article: Comparison of local particle filters and new implementations
Alban Farchi and Marc Bocquet CEREA, joint laboratory École des Ponts ParisTech and EDF R&D, Université Paris-Est, Champs-sur-Marne, France
Abstract. Particle filtering is a generic weighted ensemble data assimilation method based on sequential importance sampling, suited for nonlinear and non-Gaussian filtering problems. Unless the number of ensemble members scales exponentially with the problem size, particle filter (PF) algorithms lead to weight degeneracy. This phenomenon is a consequence of the curse of dimensionality that prevents one from using PF methods for high-dimensional data assimilation. The use of local analyses to counteract the curse of dimensionality was suggested early on. However, implementing localisation in the PF is a challenge because there is no simple and yet consistent way of gluing locally updated particles together across domains.

In this article, we review the ideas related to localisation and the PF in the geosciences. We introduce a generic and theoretical classification of local particle filter (LPF) algorithms, with an emphasis on the advantages and drawbacks of each category. Alongside with the classification, we suggest practical solutions to the difficulties of local particle filtering, that lead to new implementations and improvements in the design of LPF algorithms.

The LPF algorithms are systematically tested and compared using twin experiments with the one-dimensional Lorenz 40-variables model and with a two-dimensional barotropic vorticity model. The results illustrate the advantages of using the optimal transport theory to design the local analysis. With reasonable ensemble sizes, the best LPF algorithms yield data assimilation scores comparable to those of typical ensemble Kalman filter algorithms.

Citation: Farchi, A. and Bocquet, M.: Review article: Comparison of local particle filters and new implementations, Nonlin. Processes Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-2018-15, in review, 2018.
Alban Farchi and Marc Bocquet
Alban Farchi and Marc Bocquet
Alban Farchi and Marc Bocquet

Viewed

Total article views: 255 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
196 52 7 255 7 5

Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Mar 2018)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Mar 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 255 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 252 with geography defined and 3 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 18 Jun 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Data assimilation looks for an optimal way to learn from observations of a dynamical system to improve the quality of its predictions. The goal is to filter out the noise (both observation and model noise) to retrieve the true signal. Among all possible methods, particle filters are promising: the method is fast, elegant and it allows for a Bayesian analysis. In this review paper, we discuss implementation techniques for (local) particle filters in high dimensional systems.
Data assimilation looks for an optimal way to learn from observations of a dynamical system to...
Share